|
|
|
|
|
that is the question - or is it? The real
question we need to ask ourselves is, what type of filtration do we need?
In today’s engineering climate, most of us will have to learn something
about filtration. Most engineers do not spend a great deal of time learning
about a subject unless there is an immediate application. Therefore, the
fundamentals of filtration technology is here introduced in a quick and
simple manner. |
|
|
|
|
Filtration theory, terminology, test standards,
classification and selection are outlined and explained. This information
provides a solid basis of knowledge from which an engineer can make sound
decisions regarding filter selection and application in most engineering
projects. |
|
|
|
|
The reasons for using filtration technology are
many. In some cases, filters are used to purify the product. In others,
they are used to clean auxiliary fluids. Cleaner fluids can also extend
equipment life by reducing erosion. Next, is a short list of examples. |
|
|
|
|
Increase pump, bearing, and tool life (cutting
and grinding coolants) |
|
Keep valves from sticking |
|
Prevent nozzles from plugging |
|
Increase product yields (semiconductor IC
manufacturing) |
|
Provide clearer cleaner products (high purity
solvents, RO pre-filtration, potable liquids, edible Oil) |
|
|
|
Remove agglomerates for smoother coatings (inks,
paints, and varnishes) Remove bacteria to prevent spoilage (wine, beer) |
|
Protect strata from wells (secondary oil
recovery) |
|
Remove harmful by-products (heavy metals as hydroxides, pyrogen
removal) |
|
Recover precious metals |
|
Recycle fluids as much as possible to reduce
disposal costs |
|
|
|
|
Filtration is defined as the physical separation
of constituents from a fluid by means of flow through a permeable or a
porous medium. A common example is the coffee maker. The coffee grounds are
removed from the brewed coffee by a filter. The coffee filter (porous
medium) provides the physical separation of the grounds from the water
(constituents). |
|
|
|
|
Filters are rated by the size of particles for
which they are designed to remove. The size is defined in terms of
"microns". A micrometer is actually the correct term. One
micrometer is equal to 10-6 meter. |
|
|
|
To place the micrometer into physical
perspective, the unaided eye can see a 40 micron object unaided. This is
approximately the diameter of a human hair. |
|
|
|
|
Filters are classified according to the size of
the particles for which they are intended to remove. Different sized
particles require different types of filters. |
|
|
|
Table 1 gives a broad overview of the
classification system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a filtration system to work, there are a
couple basics requirements. |
|
|
|
First, there must exist a porous media that
allows flow. |
|
|
|
Second, there must exist a pressure difference
across the medium, such as gravity, a vacuum, or a positive pressure
source. |
|
|
|
The differential pressure across the filter is
defined as the pressure from the feed minus the pressure downstream or
after the filter. |
|
|
|
|
A typical filtration assembly consists of
housing and the filter medium. |
|
|
|
The housing retains the fluid, positions the
medium, provides the fluid a pathway through the medium, and contains the
pressure of the system. |
|
|
|
|
Most filter ratings are based on filtration
efficiency and dirt holding capacity. |
|
|
|
The filter’s efficiency is a measurement of its
ability to remove particles. In other words, how effectively and
consistently can a filter remove particles of a given size. |
|
|
|
For example, say that a filter is rated at 90%
efficiency for 5 micron particles. This means that the filter will remove
90% of the particles flowing through it that are 5 microns in size and
larger. |
|
|
|
|
Another way to denote particle removal
efficiency is to use Beta Ratios: |
|
|
|
Beta Ratio. The ratio of the number of particles
of a given size and larger in the flow upstream of the filter, to the
number of particles of the same size and larger downstream of the filter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two type of efficiency ratings:
nominal and absolute. |
|
|
|
Nominal. The size of particles removed at a set
efficiency under established conditions.
Manufacturers can vary nominal ratings anywhere from 50-98% removal
efficiency, depending on product and company. |
|
|
|
Absolute. This implies 100% removal of particles
at a set rating. Filter manufacturers vary their definition of absolute to
mean anywhere from 98.7 to 99.99%, also depending on product and company. |
|
|
|
|
Filtration efficiencies and performance can vary
with actual "real world" conditions. |
|
|
|
Filter manufacturers rate their filters under
laboratory conditions. |
|
|
|
The field performance of a filter can be
affected by flow rate, viscosity of the fluid being filtered, concentration
of contaminant, and measurement techniques. |
|
|
|
|
Filter life is determined by the filter’s Dirt
Holding Capacity (DHC). DHC is defined as the amount of contaminant (weight
basis) fed to a filter that attains its terminal differential pressure
(i.e. the end of its service life, typically 30-50 psi). |
|
|
|
This sounds like a misnomer, but it is not. The
dirt retention capacity is the actual amount of dirt that a filter retains. |
|
|
|
|
There are two basic types of filtration media: |
|
|
|
Depth |
|
Surface. |
|
|
|
Each type has its own advantages and
disadvantages. |
|
Table 2 provides an overview. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filtration is utilized for the removal of a wide
range of contaminants, from the filtering of boulders to the separation of
ions. |
|
|
|
Though the science of filtration is vast and
complex, the selection of filtration system can be simplified by
remembering a few basic points: |
|
|
|
|
Filter micron ratings may not be comparable
among manufacturers. For example, you are asked to replace a 50 micron
filter from "Company A" with a filter from "Company B." |
|
|
|
The first question that should be asked is
"what efficiency of particle removal is needed, 50% 90% 99.98%,
nominal, absolute?" One must know how specific filter manufacturers
rate their own filters. A filter’s micron rating should only be used as a
guide to narrowing down initial selections. |
|
|
|
Remember, filter companies rate their filters
under laboratory conditions, not actual application testing. |
|
|
|
|
There is no substitute for cartridge filter
testing in actual "real world" use. Just because a filter has a
long service life in a laboratory does not necessarily mean it will in real
applications. |
|
|
|
Each specific process will dictate whether
surface or depth filtration media is needed. |
|
|
|